Thanks Gary, another great post. and another good interview by Tucker. On the Floyd issue, Legal Insurrection covered the trial and provided legal analysis throughout. Verdict and trial governed by emotion and politics and and not facts. Ditto on the J6 trials and Trump prosecution. The "So What?"
Critical Thinking by the citizenry is required to sustain our Republic. it involves taking the role of a Jurist to analyze both sides of an argument, the evidence (facts), and the counter-arguments before making a decision. The norm today is making a decision based on a one-sided closing argument.
Thanks Gary, another great post. and another good interview by Tucker. On the Floyd issue, Legal Insurrection covered the trial and provided legal analysis throughout. Verdict and trial governed by emotion and politics and and not facts. Ditto on the J6 trials and Trump prosecution. The "So What?"
Critical Thinking by the citizenry is required to sustain our Republic. it involves taking the role of a Jurist to analyze both sides of an argument, the evidence (facts), and the counter-arguments before making a decision. The norm today is making a decision based on a one-sided closing argument.
"Derek Chauvin’s attorneys file petition asking U.S. Supreme Court to review case"
https://alphanews.org/derek-chauvins-attorneys-file-petition-asking-u-s-supreme-court-to-review-case/
Thanks Tim. I couldn’t agree more. We need less emotion and more reasoning based on facts.